Nov 7 meeting notes

Nov 7 meeting notes:
Location: Long Range Systems
In attendance:
John Carmack
Phil Eaton
Russ Blink
Darin Smith
Next meeting at Long Range again.
Tested side by side, the silver foam from the catalyst packs used
unsuccessfully last week did show lower reactivity than fresh foam, so we cut
a completely new foam catalyst pack for the motor tonight.
The peroxide used last week may have had some boil over from the unpurified
peroxide, which could have poisoned the pack. The peroxide was denser
this time (84%), which gives some support to that. We can test some of
the disks from today's tests and compare.
We need to get some nitric acid to experiment with cleaning the catalyst
packs.
The silver screen order finally got processed, so we will be able to test
screen versus foam catalysts soon. A benefit of the screens is that they
are pure silver, not just plated.
After our runs tonight, there were parts of the foam where the silver had been
completely stripped away. The metal plating shop had suggested sintering
the silver to the nickel foam, which we should consider if the problems are
still there after we get the distribution worked out. I expect that it
was mostly "washed off" by 450 psi flow, rather than melted off.
We have the cart to assemble all the fill system onto, but it needs some
repair work before we can tie everything down.
We finally got a DC vacuum pump wired into our fill system, so the entire
loading process is now pushbutton operated from the fill console. We
also have a vacuum gauge inline now, which is helpful. The only
remaining thing to add to the loading system is a pressure outlet on the
vacuum catch can as a safety feature. Even just adding another glass
tube out of the stopper and putting a vacuum cap on it would help, although
that probably wouldn't solve the case of accidentally opening a pressurized
tank into the vacuum catch tank instead of the peroxide dump.
I left eight sold state relays with Phil for the VTVL platform driver board.
We added some bright LED in parallel with the solenoid, so we could watch the
delay between the warm up pulse and the exhaust plume. This was a good
thing. We should plan on having LED on both the driver board, and at
each solenoid.
Even though we weren't testing partial duty cycles today, we used the PWM
program's script driven mode to precisely time our warm up pulses, which
worked great.
Our test stand isn't very well suited to these small motor firings, having a
100lb load cell and a bit of friction in the sliding bed. I will order a
25lb load cell for us, but we are still waiting on our larger load cells to
come in.
We really need to pick up a big crescent wrench for the regulator and engine
disassembly. I have to hit Home Depot tonight, so I'll grab one.
X-L Space Systems is looking like a better peroxide supplier for our needs
than FMC.
We need to get a Teflon siphon pump for transferring from larger containers.
We should rescale the load cell meter from kg to newtons.
I have a few programming things to change to make based on today's work:
Single pulse command line option for PWM didn't turn the solenoid off
correctly.
The load cell logging program should be modified to strip extra cr/lf pairs.
The PWM program should integrate load cell logging and add another column of
output next to the load cell reading for the current duty cycle. This
will simplify testing, completely eliminate manual cropping of the data, and
allow us to see the exact delays between solenoid command and thrust. I
was switching between two consoles today to run LOADCELL and PWM.
I will modify PWM to optionally control the launch valve by using separate
drive channels for on and off.
We had our act together pretty well today. We coordinated load cell
reading, PWM control, and video capture without any hitches.
Test 1
-------
100 ml peroxide
Large (45mm?) metering jet
250 psi
Three 200 ms warm up pulses separated by two seconds each, then full open.
The first warm up pulse had a long delay before catalyzing, but the second one
was quite active, so we decided to only use a single warm up pulse on the
following tests.
The main firing started off perfectly clear, but clouded up after a half
second. We decided we were still pumping too much peroxide through, so
we moved to a smaller metering jet for the next run.
Test 2
-------
100 ml peroxide
Small (23mm?) metering jet
250 psi
200 ms on, 2000 ms off, full open.
The motor was obviously still warm, as the single warm up pulse was fairly
vigorous.
The first quarter second was cloudy, but it cleared for rest of the run.
Peak thrust decreased, but it held together for the entire run. It did
demonstrate an odd thrust bump just as the last of the peroxide was spraying
into the engine.
We decided to increase the pressure, while keeping the small jet.
Test 3
-------
100 ml peroxide
Small metering jet
450 psi
200 ms on, 2000 ms off, full open.
The first quarter second was cloudy again, but it cleared up briefly, then
clouded up for the remainder of the run. The spike before blow down at
the end was more pronounced.
The thrust when the engine was fully catalyzing was about 35% greater than the
250 psi run.
Test 4
-------
Remaining peroxide, about 300 ml
Small metering jet
450 psi
200 ms on, 2000 ms off, full open.
The behavior was similar to test 3, but the longer running time showed that
once it went cloudy it never does clear back up. There was a longer
period of sputtering higher thrust at the end.
Observations
----------------
Even though the runs were close enough together that the motor did not have
time to cool all the way down, the warm up pulses were generating les thrust
on each succeeding run. The catalyst pack may have been degrading with
each hot run. When we took it apart, the core had some areas completely
stripped of silver. On the other hand, we may just be aliasing in the
12hz sampling rate of the load cell meter.
Our current theory for the increase in thrust just as the peroxide runs out is
that the gas flows through around the remaining liquid in the catalyst pack
instead of forcing it out, allowing the last remains to completely catalyze,
unlike the steady state, which was forcing it out through just the center of
the pack before it had time to decompose.
We were aiming for about 5kg of thrust from the small motor at 100% duty cycle
with 450psi. Test 1 had a period of apparently proper functioning at
250psi, but only gave about 1.6kg of thrust. Scaled up, that is still
less than half what we are aiming for. Once we get things working
properly on the existing jets, we will need to try larger ones. We don't
know yet where the solenoid becomes the limiting factor, but even the large
jet was a very noticeable restriction over no jet at all when we were water
testing.
Upcoming Tests
--------------------
Once we get a larger bulk supply of peroxide, we will test Juan's motor.
While working with our distillation unit, the small motor lets us get a lot
more results each week.
The large jet at 250psi should be our test case for improving the catalyst
pack. If we get a clean run all the way through, we have made an
improvement.
We are going to design several different spreading plates for the forward end
of the catalyst pack. Darin has a friend at a laser cutting shop, so we
are going to get a batch of different ideas tested.
Our current plate has fairly sizable holes in it, which may be allowing the
entire flow to channel primarily down only a few holes in the center.
The holes should probably be 20mm or smaller for this size motor.
If you pour water into our foam packs, it naturally tends to flows out the
center even if you spread the water over the entire top surface, so it is
probably best to have injector holes only near the edge, and let it flow
towards the center by itself. There may be more danger of channeling
around the edges, but we are currently burning out the center of the pack, so
I don't think that is a primary problem.
We want to try significantly compressing one of the foam catalyst packs to
increase its pressure drop.
Cutting out all the little circles of foam is a pain, and cutting silver
screen is going to be worse, so we want to try making a pack by just rolling
the foam up into a cylinder, then crunching it into the motor. We will
probably have to shim it with a few disks to keep the injector plate at the
correct height.
We had about 600ml of peroxide this week, so if we have a similar amount next
week I think we should make two firings in each of three new configurations:
New plate over a hand packed catalyst.
New plate over a compressed catalyst pack.
New plate over a rolled and compressed catalyst pack.
If the first run is clear at 250psi, we will try the second at 450.
Otherwise, we will just see if the behavior improves on the second test when
the engine is warmer.
Phil: we should get some more of the foam plated, and get it sintered on this
time. Better flow distribution will probably help avoid stripping the
silver on the runs we made today, but we are going to need to flow over twice
as much in the final form, so it will probably remain an issue. If we
have enough of the existing plated foam for three separate catalyst packs, we
can probably live with that at the low pressure / flow rates.
Russ: don't forget to refill the nitrogen bottle and get more peroxide
feedstock.
We still need a 1000+ psi regulator for the nitrogen. We should plan on
a full test matrix of pressure and jet size changes once we nail the catalyst
pack.
Eventually we will want a couple pressure taps and multiple channels of data
collection. It may also be interesting to allow the flight computer to
watch chamber pressure, so it can tell if one of the engines is flooding.
If catalyst stripping or poisoning remains an issue, this would be a valuable
thing to have.
|